The dissemination of astronomical events is slated to grow in importance after the recent Decadal Report from the US National Academy (more details). The top-ranked ground based facility is the LSST, which will survey a lot of the sky every three days, discovering what has changed, and is expected to release thousands of transients every night — asteroids, supernovae, variables, flare stars, active galaxies, and so on. And yet, to extract the science from this bounty there will need to be rapid followup by both small and large telescopes, some organization and infrastructure that is only now being thought through. Of course the majority of the transients are faint (the LSST is an eight-meter telescope!), and so needs an equally large, or larger telescope to get more detail about it. For the rare events that are astrophysically interesting, there should be a fast way to get the worlds big telescopes pointed to it.
It is not just difficult to get follow-up time on big telescopes, but also it is difficult to know which transients are interesting! The telescope will detect sources that are much brighter now than they were in the past, but the explanation is difficult from this sparse data. What is needed is more data! By analogy to normal life, suppose you hear a telephone ringing; you wonder which phone is ringing and who might be calling … but more information is needed, perhaps a follow-up observation (pick up the phone), or external information (you are expecting a call). This is the portfolio that comes with events in Skyalert, the essential co-information that allows decisions to be made.
In addition to understanding the astrophysical nature of the transient, another complication is that different people have different ideas of what is interesting. We need to know about these communities and what kind of event they want: a community that wants bright transients, another that wants asteroids or trans-pluto minor planets, or a community that wants transients near known X-ray sources. What will machines want, such as robotic telescopes, versus what human observers want? Is reliable delivery important, even several days after the observation? What kind of science can be done with a repository of events from multiple sources? And let us not forget the ‘multi-messenger’ astronomy that includes exotic channels such as gravitational waves or ultra-high-energy neutrinos.
So the next couple of years carries the challenge of building a suitable infrastructure for event distribution, something that can handle a wide variety of astronomical transients; something near real-time; something distributed and reliable, with no single point of failure; something that can scale up to large volume of events. One candidate is used all over the world for instant messaging, the XMPP protocol, it has many useful features, but also a little more complexity than the simple alternatives.
